Ethical controversial about the abortion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethical controversial about the spontaneous abortion - Essay causaThese peck base their argument with Aristotle point of view that abortion is function since it creates a strong agency for people to control the size of their family. Supporters of abortion believe that there is no biblical text that specifically prohibits abortion, despite many citing various biblical verses as a framework for forbidding abortion. This essay seeks to emphasise the ethical controversial about abortion. In the article entitled, Abortion in Australia a Legal Misconception 2005 Kerry Petersen presented the intellection polls, which showed that most Australians approved women having their rights to carry out abortions. In Australia, there has been little support and emphasize for introducing confining laws that ban abortion and most state regards abortion as legal to protect the health of the adult female (Kerry 142). The ground on which abortion is allowed differs from state to state. In practic e, most states in Australia believe that all women curb the right to access medical services for termination of pregnancy especially in miscues when the pregnancy whitethorn interfere with their health. The major aspect surrounding abortion in modern times is just when the somebody enters into the body. Just as in ancient times, Aristotle believed that if performed early, abortion was not killing the human life (Mercer 22). He considered that the embryo gained a human soul after forty long time if male and ninety days if female. Before that period, Aristotle believed that the embryo had animal and vegetable soul. In modern times, some people believe that a woman has an ethical obligation to eject pregnancy if conducted at an early stage. In this regard, most people claim that women whitethorn terminate a pregnancy because of many reasons such as in the case of incest or rape, when the mother is not financially prepared, or when the pregnancy interferes with the mothers health. B y virtue, the ingathering of human cells has the right to live if only it has reached a specific stage of development. With this, it stands out that it is right to terminate the pregnancy provided it is d champion at an early stage. A study conducted in 2009 by Rita indicates that, a significant woman has the moral right to terminate pregnancy if the pregnancy interferes with her personal life. In other words, the woman has the right to take the decision without legal or moral intervention of others. A woman has the right of ownership to her body. With this, she can defy the decision to abort the foetus if it is interfering with her life or health. Additionally, it may not be ethically wrong to terminate a pregnancy in cases where the mother has to choose, which of the connect twin will die. In such cases, the operation required to separate them may cause one infant to die. The woman may be forced to abandon one of her child to save the other. Nevertheless, opponents of abortion hold that human lives are sacred and one should treat them with respect and reverence (Mercer 30). Most religions focus that, God is the creator and giver of life, and human beings should not destroy what he has created in his image. The Roman Catholic Church maintains that abortion is against Gods word and natural law, and there should be no scenarios that make it better or right. Ethically, religious experts believe that the foetus deserve to live just like a human being does (Haugen, Susan, and