Thursday, April 25, 2019

Manage Performance Management Systems Case Study

Manage Performance Management Systems - Case bring ExampleAs the case study tells us, Samanthas coifance was not satisfactory either due to a shortage in quantity or a lack of quality. The situation for strongly against Samantha and seizing the opportunity, woodpecker shoot her. However this wasnt the best possible process to terminate an employee. pecker should induct prepared Samantha in front of the termination that her performance wasnt up to the mark and she should increase her efficiency to maintain her place in the company. This blackball reinforcement would energise motivated Samantha to work harder and would construct warned her ab away what could happen. This way if her performance would not have increased, her termination would set in as an automatic process sort of than a shock.Appraisal of an employee is not based solely on the output produced by that employee. Other factors such as experience of the employee, go of years served in the company, future value o f the employee to the company all should come into consideration when an employee is being appraised. peter is committing a mistake by only judging the quantity and the quality of the output. There could be a variety of reasons why Samanthas output is not up to the standard. It could be because of the type of work that is male orientated or maybe Samantha is troubled by external sources which affects her performance at work. So therefore Peter should consider factors and analyze how those factors might be affecting Samanthas performance rather than just enumerateing at the result.Another mistake that Peter is committing here is that the decision taken is too abrupt. He should think out the termination process with more detail and information.Another thing that Peter should look into when appraising is to chew the fat other fellow members about the person being appraised. This would help identify the problem areas and also hap a better idea of the employees situation.Q3)As mentio ned earlier, Peter has not analyzed the situation clearly. He should have had prepared a full progress report on Samanthas work since shes been working with the company. Doing this would have attached Peter a clearer picture about Samanthas situation and the reason for her low performance. Peter also should have stipulation a heads-up to Samantha about her possible termination in order to prepare her for her firing. The coming together could have been held in a different manner like a personal meeting rather than just being a performance appraisal to give it a more caring look for Samantha.Not setting up a type for Samantha, Peter has now got himself in a tangle. He wants to fire Samantha but is held back by her tears. The situation calls for a postponement for the immediate termination. Samantha should be given a time of 2 months to perform better than the standard in order to regain losses Peter had to incur because of her inefficiency. During this period Samantha must perfor m better or she will be fired from her current job at the company. Giving a grace period to Samantha will enable her to perform better to save her much needed job and it would also act as a warning and preparatory lesson.Case Study 12.2Q1)Employee evaluation is an assessment of employees based on their personal characteristics and their performance at work. This evaluation needs to be friendly in order for the employees to feel at ease.Chan made sooner a few mistakes in his employee evaluation. First of all Chan is too haughty

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.